Oh, by the way that was a really cool video. For those that would like to see it, here it is.
This video seems to be from 1999. It is yet another video showing evidence for why you don’t want to put ionization smoke alarms in your home. Alarms shown are the 83R (SA67D v2), the First Alert photoelectric models with the System Sensor 2400 style protrusion (Pittway owned both Sys. Sens. and BRK/First Alert!) and the SA90LT. This video is from Canada, so Pittway just decided to add -A to the end of the model numbers for the ULC versions.
It is tragic that this company does not inform the public that ionization alarms are FLAME alarms, not smoke alarms. Photoelectric alarms are SMOKE alarms.
There needs to be a law that all ionization alarms must be clearly marked as flame alarms, that do not effectively detect smoke and must be stamped with the same thing heat detectors are stamped with: THIS IS NOT A LIFE SAFETY DEVICE.