I actually thought that was supposed to be a given. Or at least it was when I was in high school and they did it. I guess not.
I actually thought that was supposed to be a given. Or at least it was when I was in high school and they did it. I guess not.
[/quote]
It was never a given when we had drills in high school - our middle school was smart enough to tell us that information.
A bit of an update regarding the email I sent:
So our district is putting our school on a pilot program for enhancing emergency preparedness for schools. Although the facilities manager didn’t give me details on what’s changing or being added, he said that there would be changes made to address the concerns I mentioned, those being malicious fire alarm activations and frequent false alarm occurrences, needed hardware upgrades, and the possibility of several upgrades to the alarms themselves (i.e. voice evac to be used as a mass notification system and connection of trailers).
For now, I’ll just wait and see what they do and perhaps give updates on how they can work things out.
Even if manual activation was removed, the shooter could still activate a detector by the test switch or a match, or a sprinkler. There are just too many loopholes.
[/quote]
test switches don’t actually do anything, and by using matches you’ve hit on a very important yet critically under discussed topic… there are other ways to do harm.
a test switch normally just activates the relay on a duct housing, it’s really the most useless thing ever yet people are convinced they should still be put in for some reason. in hospitals in my state they aren’t even allowed because someone at the state level realized they were useless at least.
Yes that is also really true and if we did away with manual activation the shooter probably would end up damaging a sprinkler or a smoke or heat detector in order to activate the alarms. There really isn’t a way to COMPLETELY solve this.
test switches don’t actually do anything, and by using matches you’ve hit on a very important yet critically under discussed topic… there are other ways to do harm.
a test switch normally just activates the relay on a duct housing, it’s really the most useless thing ever yet people are convinced they should still be put in for some reason. in hospitals in my state they aren’t even allowed because someone at the state level realized they were useless at least.
[/quote]
I meant on the smoke/heat detector.
I meant on the smoke/heat detector.
[/quote]
might depend on the system but most commercial detectors i’ve seen don’t have test switches like household smokes do.
I meant on the smoke/heat detector.
[/quote]
might depend on the system but most commercial detectors i’ve seen don’t have test switches like household smokes do.
[/quote]
Magtest?
Magtest?
[/quote]
lots dont even respond to those, smoke only.
lots dont even respond to those, smoke only.
[/quote]
What do you mean they don’t respond? Like they have a reed switch and don’t respond or just don’t have a reed switch?
What do you mean they don’t respond? Like they have a reed switch and don’t respond or just don’t have a reed switch?
[/quote]
like lots of modern addressable smoke detectors don’t have a mag test option, there’s no reed switch.
Mag tests only test the electronics, they don’t test if the detector can actually detect smoke so it’s not even allowed by a lot of fire marshals.
What do you mean they don’t respond? Like they have a reed switch and don’t respond or just don’t have a reed switch?
[/quote]
like lots of modern addressable smoke detectors don’t have a mag test option, there’s no reed switch.
Mag tests only test the electronics, they don’t test if the detector can actually detect smoke so it’s not even allowed by a lot of fire marshals.
[/quote]
Really? At my school we only have System Sensor 2251B smoke detectors, which does have the magnet test feature. Although the likelihood of a shooter to know this is somewhat low, being able to set off the alarm like that is not a good thing.