Anything and Everything About the FCI 7200

After six years of waiting, my brother and I have finally gotten a FCI 7200! As the title of this thread suggests, I want to document and discuss EVERY single thing I can about it, especially as we have learned a bunch of unexpected and interesting things. I assumed there would be at least some things online about this somewhat common panel that I’m sure everyone reading this has heard of or seen, but I can find very little, especially from hobbyists. Not even a single video of one going off.

What I have read from techs online is that these things are “dropping like flies”, coupled with the fact that 90% of online discussion on these is people asking how to work on them or fix them and either getting no response or even incorrect answers, I hope this thread will prove useful to YOU, the guy in 2035 who searched “FCI 7200” and found this. WAY WAY too many fire alarm and security systems have been almost entirely lost to time already, and I’m gonna do everything I can to stop that from happening to the 7200 before its too late.

If you own one or have worked on them, please chime in! This thread is for you!

Anyways, with that out of the way, here’s ours!

That’s a nice one! Congratulations on the new acquisition

Not sure I knew the 7200 even existed at all! Great acquistion! (& thanks for doing your part to help make sure life safety history is preserved, especially when it comes to the rare stuff!) Welcome back to the Fire Panel Forums after a 5-year hiatus or so too!

To start off with, the construction! Just like one of its two predecessors, the FC-72, the 7200 is a modular system with a cabinet, power supply, main CPU board (System Control Unit / SCU) and up to 30 other units / modules connected to the SCU over FCINET, a RS485 bus. Almost every module / unit is identified with a 3 letter model number or acronym ending with a U. Memorizing which is which is hard, so I guess I should start by listing every single one.
Cabinets:

The CAB-B, CAB-C, and CAB-D are the ones you see most 7200s in. They hold a vertical power supply on the left, with spots for 2 Panel Bus Adapters, PBAs, below it. The -B has space for 4.5 full size units, and the -C and -D can hold 6.5. The -D seems to vary from the -C only in depth, I assume for larger batteries. Everything inside is mounted on a plate with a hinge on the left and two nuts holding it on the right. An extender plate (with no model number given) can be installed to let them hold 1 extra unit, at the expense of battery space.

The CAB-A is the smallest one. It can only hold a SPSU, a Keyboard Display Unit, KDU, in front of that, a SCU below them, and one standard module below that. As far as I can tell, this makes a 7200 Micro when a CLIP Addressable Loop Unit, ALU, or Releasing Device Unit, RDU, installed. The manual also makes it very clear that ONLY an ALU or RDU can be put in that spot, when I see no reason why. I assume they thought anything else wouldn’t make sense despite other units being able to mount in other cabinets using the FCINET connection on the KDU. I also don’t know why the 7200 Micro was considered a separate panel, why the manual makes no mention of it, or why it got its own brochure where the SCU and ALU aren’t shown.

You are welcome! It really weirds me out how few of us seem to document stuff like this when its SO interesting! I’m constantly asking myself “Why has NO ONE taked about this yet!?!?”

As for Power Supplies:

The Switching Power Supply Unit Vertical, SPSU, as it’s name implies, is a switching power supply. However, it is only used in the CAB-A cabinet, the smallest one. It mounts horizontally behind the KDU.

The Switching Power Supply Unit Vertical, SPSU-V, as it’s name implies, is a switching power supply, and from what I can tell the power supply used in the CAB-B, C, and D cabinets, and thus most 7200s. It can run on 240 Volts as well, although I don’t believe it’ll take 50 Hz The vertical in it’s name is because unlike the SPSU, it sits vertically on the left of the cabinet. I wish I knew why they called this one the -V instead of naming the other one the SPSU-H.

The PSU, Power Supply Unit, seems to have been discontinued and replaced with the SPSU-V at some point since the section of the manual discussing it is an addendum. It uses a separate XFMR transformer and ACU terminal block.

All the power supplies charge the batteries, and provide constant and resettable power, and power for the SCU or DIU (Distributed Intelligence Unit), and the other units in the same cabinet. They also connect with the SCU / DIU with a ribbon cable which might talk to the SCU / DIU over serial. Just like the FC-72, the power LEDs and piezo are on the power supply.

Here’s a photo of my friend’s 7200 with a PSU and ACU:

And a photo of the SPSU-V on ours, which has a dead piezo.

Ahh the FCI 7200. One of my favorite classic and early(ish) processor-based addressable panels. I love the way they’re designed both externally and internally. Glad to see someone is taking the time to document one.

1 Like

Oh yeah absolutely! Do you have one too?

I started banging this out last evening and it was hard writing so formally. Saying stuff is easy, organizing it is hard! I should talk more about the stuff the manual doesn’t cover, because a lot of important stuff is straight up MISSING, like the Sensor menu. I suspect there’s a missing user guide, but I wouldn’t be surprised if some stuff is not documented properly. Far from the first time I’ve encountered that.

I do not – but this panel is one of my favorite non-Simplex 90s units to see. I’m mostly a Simplex guy and don’t dabble that much in other brands, but I would love to get my hands on one of these eventually.

Yeah: what I do to help with that is cataloging known devices (including the 7200!), known voice messages, & of course collecting & thus preserving the actual physical devices (all of which are of course important).

Kinda odd if you ask me that the 7200 doesn’t have its LCD right at the very top of the circuit board like with most panels (just noticed this). Congrats on obtaining one by the way though! (especially with how rare they supposedly are)

I didn’t get that either, but its because the SCU or DIU has to be the first on the FCINET ribbon cable due to it having RS485 bus termination resistors. There is a jumper to disable them and thus theoretically you could use external ones, but I bet FCI figured it was easier to have it be at the top for consistency.

The KDU can actually be mounted ANYWHERE. You could mount it remotely if you put a PBA in the cabinet with the SCU instead. If its in the cabinet, it has to be below the SCU just like everything else, as seen here:


In fact, its optional! Kind of. You need one if you have an addressable SLC unit for device names , but the 7200 can also be all conventional, and thus doesn’t need it! It looks really interesting, as in this reddit post and this ad from when it was first released in 1993:

There could even be multiple in the same place, but no reason to do that unless you’re testing them.

Interesting write-up! We don’t hear much about these panels in the collectors’ community; it’s always great to see folks who are passionate about a particular product and eager to share their knowledge and enthusiasm with the community. I know very little about the 7200 beyond its mere existence—it’s a panel that has barely ever crossed my mind—but I’m gaining a greater appreciation for it as I read your posts.

I hadn’t realized that the 7200 could be configured as a conventional panel without a KDU. I noticed that the KDU and SCU both have buttons labeled “reset/lamp test”, “silence”, and “acknowledge”. When a KDU is used, do the controls on the SCU simply duplicate the functions of those on the KDU, or do they serve a different purpose?

The 7200 Micro appears to have been briefly rebranded by Mircom as the FX-1000; I’m not sure whether it was a direct rebrand, however, as the FX-1000 looks slightly different from the exterior. I’ve only ever seen one of these panels (shown below). Interestingly, I have an addressable Mircom pull station from 1997 that uses an FCI-branded module—it was probably intended for use on those panels.

They duplicate each other’s controls exactly, but the panel can tell where it was ACKed / silenced from and says so in the event log.

Did you take this photo? Its the kind of thing that I really wanted to hear about in this thread as this photo is the only evidence I can find that the FX-1000 ever existed. I’d love to hear about the history of Mircom panels as I think they are related to Mirtone who was related to Edwards somehow, and this one has those signature square holes in the cabinet that every Mircom panel has. I wish I knew if that was the only thing they customized.

I can expand on that: Mirtone was founded in the early 60s & bought by General Signal Corporation in 1988, the latter of which bought Edwards in 1962 before in itself being bought by SPX Corporation in 1998, meaning Edwards now technically owns what’s left of Mirtone. Mircom (founded in 1991) could therefore be thought of as Mirtone’s spiritual successor: the two weren’t directly related to each other but they both have similar names, have the same country of origin, & are/were in similar industries.

1 Like

The president of mirtone left after the acquisition and founded mircom.

1 Like

Oh, okay: that I did not know as Wikipedia for some reason does not say that. Just like Moose’s founder leaving & founding ELK Products after the former was acquired by another company huh?

1 Like

It’s on the mircom website if you were wondering. With some other info on other websites.

https://mircom.com/about-mircom-building-solutions/our-team/

1 Like

Yes, I took the photo (in 2009). That panel was replaced with an FX-2000 in 2010 or 2011. I regret not taking a better picture of it—at the time, I didn’t realize how rare it was. The only other photos I’ve seen of an FX-1000 appear in a video presenting Mircom’s history; one of these photos is particularly interesting as it shows what appears to be an FX-1000 with on-board LED annunciation.

My hypothesis is that the FX-1000 filled the gap in Mircom’s lineup during the company’s early years while the FX-2000 was still in development. I found some information about the FX-1000 on Mircom’s old website.

I wonder if FCI ever sold the 7200 in Canada. The 7200 is ULC listed according to its datasheet, but I have never seen or even heard of an FCI system here.

1 Like

Guess its time to talk about the SCU!

There must be one per system, no more, no less. It’s the panel itself, much like the BMFC for the FC-72. So similar in fact that they share many features and specs, such as a number of electrical test points (the white triangles on the board), jumpers being used to set several settings, no piezo, no zones or initiating circuits on board, a city box connection, 2 NACs rated for 1.75 amps each, and separate alarm and trouble relays.

Unlike the BMFC though, it has a bunch of ICs, including a CPU! Specifically an Intel P80C31BH1, a member of the MCS 51 family. In fact, every unit in ours has one all to itself! I’m not sure if every unit does, but I wouldn’t be surprised. You’d think every part of the panel sharing the load would make it fast and responsive, but nah, this panel is slow as balls. Both the SCU and KDU take about half a second to respond to any button press. The acknowledge, silence, and reset buttons all have to be held down for however long to register as a press. I’m not sure if this was an intentional choice or not, but I suspect it was somewhere in between. I suspect that they didn’t connect the buttons to interupts like you would normally do for a micro controller as the CPU has to juggle a bunch of timing sensitive tasks like the serial port, with the FCINET bus that I speculate is also very timing sensitive, and coding every NAC, all while the code for every unit was written in C instead of assembly. I really wanna figure out how the units talk to each other in the future beyond what I can gather by watching them work.

Continuing the theme of weirdness, the NACs are set to be coded or continuous with two jumpers, W5 and W8. The coding pattern is set in the software FCP-7200. Now, with a panel this big, you would think you could set seperate cadences or coding patterns for each NAC, but NOPE! The SCU doesn’t have time for all that, nor does FCINET! There is only one coding pattern for the entire system, globally. If I read the manual correctly, every DSU and DIU NAC extender is wired back to the SCU to follow a coded output just like any other NAC extender. This also means that you can’t have certain inputs or events change the cadence of outputs, only on / off control. Something really nice though is the NAC trouble LEDs will flash in time with the NACs if they have a trouble. Really cool and handy IMO.

The distinctly labeled Programming Diagnostic Center on the left has a 2 digit 8 segment display used to show the status of the system, albeit in a very basic way as each other unit either has its own LEDs or the KDU to show its status. Its important but doesn’t do that much, being used for auto configuration, walk testing, and fire drills. When doing so, you use the display to enter a code that can only be 2 digits long, but the KDU seemingly uses the same codes appended with 4 zeros to make them 6 digits. I have no idea why they’re different lengths or what happens when you set them to be longer than 2 digits.

Finally is the serial port. It serves not only to connect to a computer for programming, but also as a built in printer interface! Its always printing whether anything is connected to it or not, at a fixed 1200 baud, 8 bits, 1 stop bit, with no parity. Earlier revisions used a standard DB9 connector, but newer ones like ours use a RJ11 connector with a non standard (afaik) pinout. Luckily the pinout and wiring diagrams for making your own cable are provided in the manual with plenty of detail, making it very easy to connect to! Instead of connecting a printer or FCP-7200, you can also not only use a terminal to read the printer output, but also send it commands! The ONLY place any of these are documented is the “front panel programming unlocking procedure” in the troubleshooting guide, where it just tells you to enter some random commands without explaining what they do. Don’t get excited though! Just like a ton of other panels, “front panel programming” is only referring to auto programming, which is even more ridiculously limited and useless than what you’re expecting, as you’ll see once I get talking about FCP-7200. Ugh. Luckily though, there is an EVEN MORE ENTIRELY UNDOCUMENTED program included with FCP-7200, called OTP-7200, that uses a bunch of commands! That though, is a HUGE topic on its own, and I’ve been writing for 3 or 4 hours straight, so I’ll leave talking about that for later.

I’ll leave this with some never before seen photos of the SCU with the plastic bit removed. Not much going on back there besides the LED driver.